Alameda County: Vote YES on Measure BB

AC Transit

.

Updated on 10/23/14: The San Francisco Chronicle recommends Alameda County residents vote YES on Measure BB (link to editorial).

Greenbelt Alliance supports Measure BB—the proposed reauthorization, increase, and extension of Alameda County’s ½ cent transportation sales tax.

If it passes on November 4, Measure BB would provide an unprecedented infusion of resources for transit, street repair, walking and biking infrastructure, and transit-oriented development. These investments are critical to the creation of walkable, transit-friendly neighborhoods with new homes and successful businesses within our cities and towns. Done right, upgrades to Alameda County’s transportation infrastructure and the neighborhoods it serves can improve the quality of life for residents of all income levels, reinvigorate our economy, reduce carbon emissions, and guide growth in ways that protect our region’s threatened open spaces.

As a member of a broad coalition of environmental and social equity organizations, Greenbelt Alliance worked with the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) to craft the contents of this measure. Although there are elements of the final measure that could have been better, we believe that Measure BB points Alameda County firmly in the right direction.

In 2012, a nearly-identical ballot measure failed to secure the necessary two-thirds voter majority by just a few hundred votes. This fall, we look forward to educating more voters to ensure Measure BB’s successful adoption. We’re also excited to work with ACTC to help them continue their leadership in providing transportation funding to those places that are doing the most for sustainable and equitable development.

We urge you to vote yes on Alameda County’s Measure BB this November.

To learn more about Measure BB, visit yesonbb.org

.

4 Comments on “Alameda County: Vote YES on Measure BB

  1. Jeremy.

    How will you feel when you find out that ACTC lied to you about carbon emissions? TRANSDEF opposes BB because it will result in a 31% increase in GHG emissions per capita, according to their own data–after pulling out the statewide GHG measures ACTC shouldn’t have taken credit for.

    This measure will lock in funding for 30 years. There goes any possibility of making a dent in the county’s emissions… It’s all about driving, and solo driving, at that!

  2. Pingback: Voters strongly support smart growth measures on Election Day 2014 | Smart Growth America

  3. Pingback: Positive Election Day Results for Smart Growth America | Urban Health Solutions & Urban Health Partnerships

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Error: Please enter a valid email address

Error: Invalid email

Error: Please enter your first name

Error: Please enter your last name

Error: Please enter a username

Error: Please enter a password

Error: Please confirm your password

Error: Password and password confirmation do not match